Science-- there's something for everyone
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Just for fun: Transit of Venus
On June 6th, there was a transit of Venus across the face of the sun. While a spectacular sight in any case, this event was also of historic and scientific interest. In particular, the difference between the observations made at opposite ends of the Earth (Svalbard, Norway and Canberra, Australia) were used to confirm distances in the solar system. The following video demonstrates this example of 'parallax'.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
You’re always on Mom’s mind
Researchers, led by William Chan, currently at the University
of Alberta, have found fetal cells in the brains of mothers. Yes, kids, you
really are always on our minds.
I’ve written before about a phenomenon called ‘fetal
microchimerism’. The tissues of any woman who has ever been pregnant,
regardless of whether that pregnancy resulted in a live birth, contain a few
cells from the fetus or fetuses she was carrying. For better or worse, these
fetal cells remain in the mother for the rest of her life. They’ve been
associated both with tissue repair and protection from cancer and with the
initiation of autoimmune diseases. It hasn’t been clear, until now, whether the
fetal cells can also make their way into women’s brains.
The easiest way to distinguish maternal from fetal cells is
to screen for cells that have a Y chromosome, which will only be present in the
cells of any male fetus they carry. This is exactly what the researchers did.
They performed brain autopsies on 59 women (age 32 to 101 at time of death) and
tested up to twelve regions within each brain for the presence of Y
chromosomes.
Around 60% of the women had Y carrying fetal cells in their
brains, and nearly all brain regions were affected. Clearly, fetal cells are
crossing the blood-brain barrier and making homes for themselves in their
mother’s brains. Remember, these experiments were conducted many decades after
the pregnancies that gave rise to these cells. I’d also like to point out that
the numbers of fetal cells would naturally have been much higher if the
researchers could have screened for female fetal cells as well as male ones. It
could be that the entire brain of any woman who has ever been pregnant is
permeated with cells from all those fetuses. Even more interesting, since maternal cells pass into the infant during breastfeeding, it could be that a few of those cells are from prior siblings. We could all be multiple microchimeras.
The authors also investigated whether having this fetal
microchimerism could affect whether women went on to suffer from Alzheimer’s
disease (AD). Although they found that women who had suffered from AD were less
likely to test positive for male fetal cells, this result was not significant.
A far larger study will be needed before any general conclusions can be drawn
about this.
Monday, December 10, 2012
Bad news for coastal cities
An international team of
scientists, led by Andrew Shepherd of the University of Leeds, has put together
the most comprehensive study of Arctic and Antarctic ice sheet loss to date.
They also determined how much that loss of ice is affecting global sea levels.
The news is not good.
The 47 authors used nineteen years
of satellite data to come to their conclusions. They found that the loss of the
Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets have contributed to a rise in sea level of
eleven millimeters over the past two decades. While this may not sound like a
lot, remember, that rise is continuing and increasing. Both poles are losing
ice at a faster pace. As Erik Ivins from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory
points out:
The rate of ice loss from Greenland has increased almost five-fold since the mid-1990s.
This means that the rise of the
oceans due solely to polar ice sheet loss has increased to nearly a full
millimeter per year. However, the bulk of the sea level rise is caused not by the added water from the melting ice but by the expanding of the ever warmer water. In other words, global warming will continue to be a problem even after the polar ice caps have already disappeared.
You can see an interview with Andrew Shepherd and Erik Ivins below. To watch an animation of the
researchers' results, click here.
Friday, December 7, 2012
A new contraceptive
University of Washington researchers, led by Cameron Ball,
have invented a new method of contraception. Best of all, their device, made of
drug-eluting nanofibers, blocks not only sperm but also sexually transmitted
diseases (STDs) like HIV.
Contraceptives and STD preventatives can be classed into two
broad categories depending on their mode of action. There are chemical
barriers, which can contain hormones, spermicides and/or microbicides. These compounds can be administered as pills, gels, intravaginal
rings or vaginal films. There are also physical barriers, the best known of
which is the condom. Ideally, a contraceptive would employ both chemical and
physical barriers to block sperm and infectious agents. That’s exactly what these new
nanofibers do.
The researchers used electrospinning to create their fiber
meshes out of materials that are already approved for use in human implants.
They used a tampon applicator as a template to ensure easy installation, and
incorporated a variety of anti-HIV agents into the finished product. The end
result is a soft, flexible object that releases one or more antiviral drugs.
In one of their tests, the scientists incorporated a dye
into the fibers and inserted the mesh devices into female mice. Within 30 minutes,
the mice’s vaginal tracts were completely coated with
dye, indicating that the fibers had indeed released their drug load. When
tested in tissue culture experiments, the mesh devices could inhibit both sperm
motility and HIV transmission, depending on which drugs they contained. In
addition, the fibers present an impenetrable barrier to sperm.
Caption: The electrospun fibers
can release chemicals or, as shown here, they can physically block sperm.
Credit: Kim Woodrow, Univ. of
Washington.
The invention fulfills the five criteria that Ball and his
colleagues set for themselves. The fibers are inexpensive, can deliver multiple
drugs, are fully reversible, provide extensive coverage of mucosal tissue and
can be managed solely and discreetly by women. This last is important because women can’t
always control what their partners are willing to use.
The next step is to
fine-tune the drug delivery system. Different raw materials and thicknesses can
determine how quickly the drugs are dissipated throughout the vagina. Thus, it
may be possible to create devices for both long term (sustained release) and
immediate (quick dispersal) usage, depending on the woman’s needs. And after all, the more choices women have for protecting
their health and controlling their fertility, the better.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Detecting breast cancer via methylation levels
Epigenetics, and specifically DNA
methylation, is in the news quite a lot. I’ve explained DNA methylation
before (here and here). Suffice it to say that this
‘after-factory’ alteration does not affect the sequence of DNA but does affect
the expression of that DNA, often by inactivating the genes involved. However,
you may be asking, ‘when is this new field of study going to yield anything
useful?’ If you or someone you know is at risk for developing breast cancer,
that day may be sooner than you think.
Researchers from various German universities and research
hospitals compared methylation levels in ten breast cancer tumors (two from
pre-invasive tumors and eight from invasive cancers) and ten normal controls.
Overall, they found over 200 sites that were significantly hypermethylated in
the tumor samples. In particular, they found nine genes that were already
significantly hypermethylated in the pre-invasive tumors. In fact, methylation
levels did not differ much between pre-invasive and invasive tumors or between
different tumor subtypes. This finding suggests that methylation can be used as
a tool for the early detection of breast cancer tumors.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Just for fun: Dew-covered insects
David Chambon had captured some amazing photographs of insects bejeweled with dew. Here's one example, but definitely go to his website to see the rest.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Bad news for cleaning up oil spills
As test subjects, the scientists chose five strains of Brachionus
plicatilis. Not only are these
rotifers (tiny marine organisms found in
zooplankton) a critical part of the marine food chain, but they are also
notoriously sensitive to environmental conditions.
The researchers exposed the rotifers to varying amounts of crude oil and/or Corexit 9500A oil dispersant (a
product used in the Gulf). The LC50 (lethal concentration 50, or amount of
product that will kill 50% of the organisms) for each combination was
determined. Depending on the strain of B. plicatilis tested, the LC50 with crude oil alone was between 2 and 20
mg oil/liter water. Oil dispersant alone yielded LC50s ranging from 0.5 to 14
mg/L. When the two components were mixed in ratios of 1:10 or 1:50 dispersant
to oil (the recommended dosages), the LC50 decreased to 0.2 to 0.3 mg/L. In
other words, the combination of crude oil plus oil dispersant is far more toxic to rotifers than either chemical alone.
There was one glimmer of good
news. When the researchers tested a ratio of 1:130 dispersant to oil (the
conditions actually used at the Deep Water Horizon disaster), toxicity did not
increase compared to using either component alone. This makes sense since the
1:50 ratio was slightly less toxic than the 1:10 ratio. Of course, you’re never
going to find a ratio that’s less toxic than the dispersant alone, which is
pretty darned lethal all by itself. Thus, the best you’re going to do is to not make things worse. Not exactly a glowing endorsement for a rescue technique.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)