Although finding exoplanets is
interesting (and nearly a thousand have been confirmed to date), the really
exciting news would be to find another planet capable of sustaining life. To do
so, such a planet would almost certainly orbit within a certain radius from its
star: the ‘habitable zone’ (HZ). The trouble is, astronomers aren’t entirely
sure just what the boundaries of a star’s HZ are. Just recently, a team of
Pennsylvania State University cosmologists, led by Ravi Kopparapu, have
redefined the borders of the HZ.
The region within an HZ is largely determined by the presence of two
molecules: liquid water and carbon dioxide. If a planet is too close to its star, any water will boil off
into space. Too far, and the water will remain permanently frozen. Because the
outer edge of the HZ can be extended if the planet has a carbon dioxide
atmosphere to warm it, researchers take the presence of CO2 into
account when predicting the outermost limits of an HZ.
While Kopparapu and his colleagues
still use H20 and CO2 to define where an HZ will fall,
they believe that the criteria used to detect those molecules needs to be adjusted. When
they used updated data, they found that HZs tend to be a bit further out than
previously thought. This means that some planets that were written off may in
fact be within the HZ of their star, but also that some hopeful candidates
aren’t in the HZ after all.
Caption: The graphic shows
habitable zone distances around various types of stars. Some of the known
extrasolar planets that are considered to be in the habitable zone of their
stars are also shown. On this scale, Earth-Sun distance is one astronomical
unit, which is roughly 150 million kilometers.
Credit: Chester Herman
Notice that, according to the
new standards, Earth (seen near the top right) barely falls into the HZ of our sun. No doubt this new
model has some more tweaking in store.
No comments:
Post a Comment