Here’s an innovation I think we can all get behind: needless
injections. Andrew Taberner of the University of Auckland and Catherine Hogan
and Ian Hunter from MIT have developed a controllable jet injection device that
could replace standard needles for delivering drugs. Medicines would be
delivered through the skin in the form of a high-pressured jet with no stabbing. The tiny hole created by the injection would quickly and painlessly heal.
Jet injection systems aren’t new. They were used to deliver
vaccines as far back as the ‘60’s. I should note that this was before the
notion was popularized by the original Star Trek series. Conventional jet
injectors rely on a variety of energy sources, often chemical reactions or compressed springs or
gases, to achieve the power necessary for high pressure
drug delivery. Unfortunately, this means that doctors cannot control the
injection speed once it’s begun.
In contrast, Hunter and his team used a Lorentz-force motor
(essentially a magnet covered with a coil of wire). When current is applied to
the device, this creates a force that plunges a piston and delivers the drug.
By altering the amount of current, researchers can control the velocity and
pressure of the drug delivery in real time. For example, they can use greater force to penetrate the skin,
and then less force to dissipate the drug once it’s passed through that
barrier.
If I’m breaching a baby’s skin to deliver vaccine, I won’t need as much pressure as I would need to breach my skin. We can tailor the pressure profile to be able to do that, and that’s the beauty of this device.
MIT-engineered device injects drug
without needles, delivering a high-velocity jet of liquid that breaches the
skin at the speed of sound.
Image courtesy of the MIT
BioInstrumentation Lab.
Thus far, the device has only been
tested on gels and animals, not humans. Due to concerns
about infection, the World Health Organization no longer recommends
conventional jet injectors for the delivery of vaccines. This new injector
would have to have a better safety record to win over the medical establishment.
I for one, am rooting for it to do so!
You can see an explanation by Hunter
and Hogan below:
We used to use a gas powered needleless injector system for vaccines. A lot of the parents liked the idea because they thought would be less painful and their child would not be as fearful. We thought it would be safer for the staff because it would eliminate accidental needlesticks. I can tell you from my own experience that it was more painful than a needle injection. It felt like a punch in the arm. Eventually we went back to needle injections because of the pain and complaints of redness in the injection sites.
ReplyDeleteThat's really interesting. Thanks for sharing this. The device I mentioned hasn't been tested on people yet. If it's as painful as you say, it may not get much of a following, except maybe for people who are terrified of needles.
ReplyDelete